Cost analysis of care and blood transfusions in patients with Major Obstetric Haemorrhage in Ireland.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstetric haemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. We aimed to estimate the economic cost of Major Obstetric Haemorrhage (MOH) and the cost of therapeutic blood components used in the management of MOH in Ireland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a nationwide cross-sectional study utilising top-down and bottom-up costing methods on women who experienced MOH during the years 2011-2013. Women with MOH were allocated to Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) based on the approach to MOH management (MOH group). The total number of blood components used for MOH treatment and the corresponding costs were recorded. A control group representative of a MOH-free maternity population was designed with predicted costs. All costs were expressed in Euro (€) using 2022 prices and the incremental cost of MOH to maternity costs was calculated. Cost contributions are expressed as percentages from the estimated total cost. RESULTS: A total of 447 MOH cases were suitable for sorting into DRGs. The estimated total cost of managing women who experienced MOH is approximately €3.2 million. The incremental cost of MOH is estimated as €1.87 million. The estimated total cost of blood components used in MOH management was €1.08 million and was based on an estimated total of 3997 products transfused. Red blood cell transfusions accounted for the highest contribution (20.22%) to MOH total cost estimates compared to other blood components. CONCLUSIONS: The total cost of caring for women with MOH in Ireland was approximately €3.2 million with blood component transfusions accounting for between one third and one half of the cost.

Critical care in obstetrics: Clinical audit in the Republic of Ireland, 2014-2016.

INTRODUCTION: Admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in obstetrics is often used as a proxy for maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity (MNM/SMM) events. Understanding incidence and management of pregnant or postpartum patients requiring critical care (CC) is thus important for continued improvement of maternity care. This study aims to describe provision of critical care in obstetrics in the Republic of Ireland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The national clinical audit on critical care included 15 of 19 maternity units in Ireland (2014-2016). 960 pregnant or postpartum (within 42 days) individuals who required CC were included. Data were reported on all cases requiring level 2 or level 3 CC. We calculated basic descriptive statistics for diagnosis and process of care variables, and compared characteristics of women requiring level 2 care to those requiring level 3. Outcomes included diagnoses necessitating critical care; additional complications; level of care required; care process outcomes such as length of stay, consultation with non-obstetric specialties, location of maternal critical care, and neonatal care provision. RESULTS: Overall, the rate of critical care in obstetrics for these hospitals was 1 in 131 live births; 900 of the 960 cases required level 2 care only. Hypertensive disorders contributed to the need for critical care for 1 in 242; hemorrhage, 1 in 422; and infections, 1 in 926. A substantial minority (15.7%) had more than one diagnosis, accounting for 40% of level 3 care. Serious complications were rare (eg, hysterectomy, 1 in 3846). Parity, hospital size, and identification as high-risk antenatally (<50% cases) were associated with requiring level 3 care. Critical care was provided in multiple locations, including ICUs, HDUs, and operating theatres. Only 23.8% of patients received CC in an ICU, suggesting ICU admission is not an ideal method for identifying severe maternal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: We reported rates of critical care admission and primary diagnoses within the range of other published estimates, but huge variability exists in the literature, and within our data. ICU admission in and of itself iss not a reliable proxy for having received level 2 or 3 obstetric critical care in Ireland.

Predicting risk of postpartum haemorrhage during the intrapartum period in a general obstetric population.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate (both internally and externally) a prediction model examining a combination of risk factors in order to predict postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in a general obstetric Irish population of singleton pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We used data from the National Maternal and Newborn Clinical Management System (MN-CMS), including all singleton deliveries at Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Ireland during 2019. We defined PPH as an estimated blood loss of ≥ 1000 ml following the birth of the baby. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection was used to develop the prediction model. Candidate predictors included maternal age, maternal body mass index, parity, previous caesarean section, assisted fertility, gestational age, fetal macrosomia, mode of delivery and history of PPH. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) C-statistic. We used bootstrapping for internal validation to assess overfitting, and conducted a temporal external validation using data from all singleton deliveries at CUMH during 2020. RESULTS: Out of 6,077 women, 5,807 with complete data were included in the analyses, and there were 270 (4.65%) cases of PPH. Four variables were considered the best combined predictors of PPH, including parity (specifically nulliparous), macrosomia, mode of delivery (specifically operative vaginal delivery, emergency caesarean section and prelabour caesarean section), and history of PPH. These predictors were used to develop a nomogram to provide individualised risk assessment for PPH. The original apparent C-statistic was 0.751 (95% CI: 0.721, 0.779) suggesting good discriminative performance. There was minimal optimism adjustment to the C-statistic after bootstrapping, indicating good internal performance (optimism adjusted C-statistic: 0.748). Results of external validation were comparable with the development model suggesting good reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: Four routinely collected variables (parity, fetal macrosomia, mode of delivery and history of PPH) were identified when predicting PPH in a general obstetric Irish population of singleton pregnancies. Use of our nomogram could potentially assist with individualised risk assessment of PPH and inform clinical decision-making allowing those at highest risk of PPH be actively managed.

Predicting perineal trauma during childbirth using data from a general obstetric population.

Background: Perineal trauma is a common complication of childbirth and can have serious impacts on long-term health. Few studies have examined the combined effect of multiple risk factors. We developed and internally validated a risk prediction model to predict third and fourth degree perineal tears using data from a general obstetric population. Methods: Risk prediction model using data from all singleton vaginal deliveries at Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH), Ireland during 2019 and 2020. Third/fourth degree tears were diagnosed by an obstetrician or midwife at time of birth and defined as tears that extended into the anal sphincter complex or involved both the anal sphincter complex and anorectal mucosa. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise selection to develop the models. Candidate predictors included infant sex, maternal age, maternal body mass index, parity, mode of delivery, birthweight, post-term delivery, induction of labour and public/private antenatal care. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve C-statistic to assess discrimination, and bootstrapping techniques were used to assess internal validation. Results: Of 8,403 singleton vaginal deliveries, 8,367 (99.54%) had complete data on predictors for model development. A total of 128 women (1.53%) had a third/fourth degree tear. Three variables remained in the final model: nulliparity, mode of delivery (specifically forceps delivery or ventouse delivery) and increasing birthweight (per 100 gram increase) (C-statistic: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.79). We developed a nomogram to calculate individualised risk of third/fourth degree tears using these predictors. Bootstrapping indicated good internal performance. Conclusions: Use of our nomogram can provide an individualised risk assessment of third/fourth degree tears and potentially aid counselling of women on their potential risk.

Major obstetric haemorrhage: Incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units.

OBJECTIVE: To assess major obstetric haemorrhage incidence, management and quality of care in Irish maternity units. DESIGN: In collaboration with Irish maternity units the National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (Leitao et al., 2020) carried out a national clinical audit and surveillance of major obstetric haemorrhage (MOH). METHODS: MOH was defined as blood loss of at least 2500 ml, transfusion of five or more units of blood or documented treatment for coagulopathy. Co-ordinators in maternity units completed detailed case assessment forms. The denominator data obtained from the individual units was restricted to live births and stillbirths of babies weighing at least 500 g. International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes from hospital discharge records were used to identify cases of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and blood transfusion. RESULTS: During the time period, 2011-2018, there was a 54 % increase in MOH, a 60 % increase in PPH and a 54 % increase in blood transfusion. For 497 reported cases of MOH in 2011-2013, the median estimated blood loss was 3000 ml (range: 600-13,000 ml) and uterine atony was the most common cause. At least one uterotonic agent was used to arrest the bleeding in 94 % of the 477 MOH cases associated with a vaginal or caesarean delivery. A blood transfusion was received in 93 % of cases. Regarding quality of care, the vast majority of reported cases were described as receiving appropriate care and were well managed. CONCLUSION: Internationally, obstetric haemorrhage and especially PPH and its increasing trend remains a major challenge for service providers and clinical staff. A standardisation of definitions of PPH/severe PPH/MOH and agreed approaches to quantitation of blood loss would be valuable developments to allow better investigation and shared learning. Reducing the burden of this morbidity through improvements in care should be a real focus of maternity services.

Preventive health counselling during antenatal care using the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS) in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Maternal behaviours during pregnancy have short- and long-term consequences for maternal and infant health. Pregnancy is an ideal opportunity to encourage positive behaviour change. Despite this, limited information exists about the nature and content of lifestyle advice provided by healthcare professionals during antenatal care. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) Ireland is based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed PRAMS that monitors maternal behaviours and experiences before, during and after pregnancy. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of preventive health counselling during pregnancy. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of the PRAMS Ireland study. Using hospital discharge records, a sampling frame of 2424 mother-infant pairs was used to alternately sample 1212 women whom had recently given birth. Preventive health counselling was defined as advice during antenatal care on smoking, alcohol, infant feeding and weight gain. Self-reported maternal behaviours (smoking/alcohol cessation, gestational weight gain, infant feeding). Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, adjusting for maternal characteristics. RESULTS: Among 718 women (61% response rate), the reported counselling rates were 84.8% for breastfeeding (n = 592), 48.4% for alcohol (n = 338), 47.6% for smoking (n = 333) and 31.5% for weight gain (n = 218). Women who smoked pre-pregnancy (23.7%, n = 170) were more likely to receive counselling on its effects compared to non-smokers (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 2.72 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.84-4.02)). In contrast, women who did not breastfeed (AOR 0.74, 95%CI 0.44-1.26) and those who reported alcohol consumption pre-pregnancy (AOR 0.94, 95%CI 0.64-1.37) were not more likely to receive counselling on these topics. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy is an ideal opportunity to encourage positive behaviour change. Preventive health counselling during pregnancy is not routinely provided and rates vary widely depending on the health behaviour. This study suggests that additional strategies are needed to promote positive behaviour before and during the unique opportunity provided by pregnancy.

Incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section: A national retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate and associated risk factors for incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section in Ireland. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective population-based cohort study, conducted using the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry database (HIPE) for the period 2005-2016. All women who underwent cesarean section between 2005 and 2016 in Ireland were included. Potential risk factors for incisional surgical site infection were selected based on the existing literature and their availability within the HIPE database. The risk of incisional surgical site infection following cesarean section with exact Poisson 95% confidence intervals were reported. Multivariable Poisson regression included all potential risk factors simultaneously. Risk ratios are reported with their 95% confidence intervals and P-values. RESULTS: There were 802,182 deliveries during the study period, 219,859 of which (27.4%) were by cesarean section. There were 1396 cases of incisional surgical site infection, a risk of 0.63% (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.67%). Public patients had approximately 20% higher risk and the risk was almost 40% higher among women aged over 35 years compared with those aged under 25 years. Most notable, related to the morbidities assessed, was the twofold increased risk of incisional surgical site infection associated with pre-existing diabetes and with urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Premature rupture of membranes, pyrexia during labour and postpartum haemorrhage each increased risk by 40-60%. Hematoma of a cesarean section wound remained by far the strongest risk factor for incisional surgical site infection. CONCLUSION: Of all the risk factors we studied, hematoma had the strongest association with development of incisional surgical site infection. Of all women birthing by cesarean section in Ireland during 2005-2016, 25% had at least one of the risk factors identified by our study. Approximately 40% of the incisional surgical site infection cases came from this 25%. This might suggest that a universal approach to reducing risk of surgical site infection is warranted.

Risk factors for surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The cesarean delivery (CD) rate is increasing worldwide. Surgical site infection (SSI) incidence is likely to follow an upward trajectory. We examined the incidence and risk factors for SSI after CD. METHODS: A case-control study of women who had a lower-segment CD during the study period was performed at Ireland's Cork University Maternity Hospital. Cases were patients who presented to the hospital with SSI and who met the criteria of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Controls were randomly selected from the discharge register of CDs at a ratio of 2:1. Data were extracted from the medical records. A multivariable stepwise logistic regression model approach was used, and the results were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aORs). RESULTS: The SSI rate was 2%. The greatest contribution to risk of SSI was associated with maternal obesity (aOR, 4.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00-11.32) and hypertensive disorders (aOR, 6.67; 95% CI, 1.54-28.99]. There was also an increased risk for women who underwent an emergency CD (aOR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.09-11.30), for women who had ≥5 vaginal examinations (aOR, 3.24; 95% CI, 0.92-11.41), and for women without hypertensive disorders who delivered a baby weighing <3,500 g (aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.08-4.37). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, hypertensive disorders, emergency CD, and multiple vaginal examinations were independent risk factors for SSI after CD.

Prophylactic Placement of Internal Iliac Balloons in Patients with Abnormal Placental Implantation: Maternal and Foetal Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report on outcomes following the use of prophylactic internal iliac artery occlusion balloons in patients with abnormal placental implantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients with abnormal placental implantation who underwent prophylactic iliac balloon placement prior to delivery in a University Maternity Hospital. Various clinical and technical factors were analysed, including technical success of balloon placement, blood loss and number of blood units transfused, duration of surgery, length of stay, hysterectomy rates, complications related to the balloon insertion, foetal pH and infant Apgar scores. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with placenta accreta or a variant thereof underwent caesarean section after first undergoing prophylactic placement of bilateral internal artery balloons. Average follow-up duration was 2.08 years. The average gestational age was 37 weeks 6 days, and the mean gravidity was 2.8. The mean number of previous caesarean sections was 2.4, while the mean maternal age was 35 years. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 1.4 L, and the mean number of blood units transfused was 2. Mean duration of surgery was 90 min, mean total length of hospital stay 7.5 days, while the mean duration of ICU/HDU stay was 1.2 days. The balloons were inflated in 60% of cases and two patients (2/22-9%) underwent subsequent hysterectomy. There were no major maternal complications due to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic placement of arterial balloons prior to caesarean section in patients with placenta accreta is well tolerated and leads to satisfactory maternal and foetal outcomes with minimal complications.

What do women want? Valuing women's preferences and estimating demand for alternative models of maternity care using a discrete choice experiment.

In many countries, there has been a considerable shift towards providing a more woman-centred maternity service, which affords greater consumer choice. Maternity service provision in Ireland is set to follow this trend with policymakers committed to improving maternal choice at hospital level. However, women's preferences for maternity care are unknown, as is the expected demand for new services. In this paper, we used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to (1) investigate women's strengths of preference for different features of maternity care; (2) predict market uptake for consultant- and midwifery-led care, and a hybrid model of care called the Domiciliary In and Out of Hospital Care scheme; and (3) calculate the welfare change arising from the provision of these services. Women attending antenatal care across two teaching hospitals in Ireland were invited to participate in the study. Women's preferred model of care resembled the hybrid model of care, with considerably more women expected to utilise this service than either consultant- or midwifery-led care. The benefit of providing all three services proved considerably greater than the benefit of providing two or fewer services. From a priority setting perspective, pursuing all three models of care would generate a considerable welfare gain, although the cost-effectiveness of such an approach needs to be considered.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Two Alternative Models of Maternity Care in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: The Irish government has committed to expand midwifery-led care alongside consultant-led care nationally, although very little is known about the potential net benefits of this reconfiguration. OBJECTIVES: To formally compare the costs and benefits of the major models of care in Ireland, with a view to informing priority setting using the contingent valuation technique and cost-benefit analysis. METHODS: A marginal payment scale willingness-to-pay question was adopted from an ex ante perspective. 450 pregnant women were invited to participate in the study. Cost estimates were collected primarily, describing the average cost of a package of care. Net benefit estimates were calculated over a 1-year cycle using a third-party payer perspective. RESULTS: To avoid midwifery-led care, women were willing to pay €821.13 (95% CI 761.66-1150.41); to avoid consultant-led care, women were willing to pay €795.06 (95% CI 695.51-921.15). The average cost of a package of consultant- and midwifery-led care was €1,762.12 (95% CI 1496.73-2027.51) and €1018.47 (95% CI 916.61-1120.33), respectively. Midwifery-led care ranked as the best use of resources, generating a net benefit of €1491.22 (95% CI 989.35-1991.93), compared with €123.23 (95% CI -376.58 to 621.42) for consultant-led care. CONCLUSIONS: While both models of care are cost-beneficial, the decision to provide both alternatives may be constrained by resource issues. If only one alternative can be implemented then midwifery-led care should be undertaken for low-risk women, leaving consultant-led care for high-risk women. However, pursuing one alternative contradicts a key objective of government policy, which seeks to improve maternal choice. Ideally, multiple alternatives should be pursued.

Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and as a result repeat CS is common. The optimal mode of delivery in women with one previous CS is widely debated and the risks to the infant are understudied. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if women with a trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) had an increased odds of neonatal and infant death compared to women with an elective repeat CS (ERCS). METHODS: A population register-based cohort study was conducted in Denmark between 1982 and 2010. All women with two deliveries [in which the first was a CS, and the second was an uncomplicated, term delivery (n = 61,626)] were included in the study. Logistic regression models were used to report adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the odds of death according to mode of delivery. The main outcome measures were neonatal death (early and late) and infant death. RESULTS: Women with a TOLAC had an increased odds of neonatal death (AOR 1 · 87, 95% CI 1 · 12 to 3 · 12) due to an increased risk of early neonatal death (AOR 2 · 06, 95% CI 1 · 19 to 3 · 56) and no effect on late neonatal death (AOR 0 · 97, 95% CI 0 · 22 to 4 · 32), or infant death (AOR 1 · 12, 95% CI 0 · 79 to 1 · 59) when compared to the reference group of women with an ERCS. There was evidence of a cohort effect as the increased odds of neonatal death (AOR 3 · 89, 95% CI 1 · 33 to 11 · 39) was most significant in the earlier years (1982-1991) and gradually disappeared (AOR 1 · 01, 95% CI 0 · 44 to 2 · 31) in the later years (2002-2010). CONCLUSIONS: Although an increased risk of neonatal death was found in women with a TOLAC, there was evidence of a cohort effect, which showed this increased odds disappearing over time. Advances in modern healthcare including improved monitoring and earlier detection of underlying pregnancy complications may explain the findings.

Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Caesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally during the past three decades. Surgical site infection (SSI) following CS is a common cause of morbidity with reported rates of 3-15%. SSI represents a substantial burden to the health system including increased length of hospitalisation and costs of postdischarge care. The definition of SSI varies with the postoperative follow-up period among different health systems, resulting in differences in the reporting of SSI incidence. We propose to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled estimate for the overall incidence of SSI following CS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a comprehensive search to identify all potentially relevant published studies on the incidence of SSI following CS reported from 1992 in the English language. Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus will be searched using a detailed search strategy. Following study selection, full-text paper retrieval, data extraction and synthesis, we will appraise study quality and risk of bias and assess heterogeneity. Incidence data will be combined where feasible in a meta-analysis using Stata software and fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. This systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this review will use published data. The review will evaluate the overall incidence of SSI following CS and will provide the first quantitative estimate of the magnitude of SSI. It will serve as a benchmark for future studies, identify research gaps and remaining challenges, and emphasise the need for appropriate prevention and control measures for SSI post-CS. A manuscript reporting the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015024426.

Peripartum hysterectomy incidence, risk factors and clinical characteristics in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy (PH) shows fifty-fold variation worldwide (0.2-10.5/1000 deliveries) and risk factors include advancing maternal age and parity, previous caesarean section (CS) and abnormal placentation. OBJECTIVES: In this first national study of PH in Ireland, our objectives were threefold: to describe the national trend in PH incidence over 15 years since 1999; to assess risk of PH associated with morbidly adherent placenta (MAP), placenta praevia and postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) during 2005-2013; and to describe the causes, interventions and outcomes of PH cases during 2011-2013. STUDY DESIGN: For the 15-year time-trend analysis, PH cases and denominator data were extracted from Ireland's Hospital In-Patient Enquiry database. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis assessed risk of PH associated with MAP, placenta praevia and PPH. In collaboration with the 20 Irish maternity units we carried out a three-year national clinical audit of severe maternity morbidity. PH was a notifiable morbidity and the audit included detailed review of MOH cases. RESULTS: In 1999-2013 there were 298 PH cases, a rate of 0.32/1000 deliveries. During the period 2005-2013, the PH rate was 50 times higher in deliveries involving PPH, 100 times higher with placenta praevia and 1000 times higher with MAP. During the clinical audit (2011-2013) there were 65 PH cases, a rate of 0.33/1000 deliveries, increasing with advancing age and parity. The reporting of abnormal placentation, primarily the co-occurrence of placenta praevia and MAP, was linked with previous CS. Fifty-six of the 65 cases suffered MOH, most commonly associated with placenta praevia, MAP and uterine atony. Prophylactic and therapeutic uterotonic agents were appropriately used in the majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PH in Ireland has been consistently low over 15 years, averaging one case every 3000 deliveries. The recognised risk factors of MAP, placenta praevia and PPH were independently associated with PH, with MAP being by far the strongest predictor. The vast majority of PH cases in our clinical audit were associated with MOH. Some deficiencies were noted in antenatal care, in certain elements of treatment and clinical governance protocols but adherence to guidelines was generally high.

Reaction on Twitter to a Cluster of Perinatal Deaths: A Mixed Method Study.

BACKGROUND: Participation in social networking sites is commonplace and the micro-blogging site Twitter can be considered a platform for the rapid broadcasting of news stories. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the Twitter status updates and subsequent responses relating to a number of perinatal deaths which occurred in a small maternity unit in Ireland. METHODS: An analysis of Twitter status updates, over a two month period from January to March 2014, was undertaken to identify the key themes arising in relation to the perinatal deaths. RESULTS: Our search identified 3577 tweets relating to the reported perinatal deaths. At the height of the controversy, Twitter updates generated skepticism in relation to the management of not only of the unit in question, which was branded as unsafe, but also the governance of the entire Irish maternity service. Themes of concern and uncertainty arose whereby the professional motives of the obstetric community and staffing levels in the maternity services were called into question. CONCLUSIONS: Twitter activity provides a useful insight into attitudes towards health-related events. The role of the media in influencing opinion is well-documented and this study underscores the challenges that clinicians face in light of an obstetric media scandal. Further study to identify how the obstetric community could develop tools to utilize Twitter to disseminate valid health information could be beneficial.

Positive lifestyle changes around the time of pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of positive lifestyle behaviours before and during pregnancy in Ireland. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Population-based study in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 718 women of predominantly Caucasian origin from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), Ireland, were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive lifestyle behaviour changes before and during pregnancy in Ireland on alcohol consumption, smoking, folate use and nutrition. RESULTS: Of 1212 women surveyed, 718 (59%) responded. 26% were adherent to all three recommendations on alcohol consumption, smoking and folate use before pregnancy. This increased to 39% for the same three behaviours during pregnancy, with greater increases in adherence observed among women with the lowest adherence before pregnancy. Age, education and ethnicity gaps in adherence before pregnancy appeared to narrow during pregnancy. Adherence to all seven food pyramid guidelines was less than 1% overall, and less than 1% of participants met all four micronutrient guidelines on vitamin D, folate, calcium and iron intake around the time of pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Low levels of healthy lifestyle behaviours before pregnancy and low levels of positive lifestyle behaviours during pregnancy demonstrate an urgent need for increased clinical and public health efforts to target deleterious health behaviours before, during and after pregnancy.

Compliance with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence risk-based screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate compliance with risk-based screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) in a nulliparous cohort. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of nulliparous women recruited to a prospective cohort, the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study, was performed. Population included 2428 healthy nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies, recruited within Cork, Ireland; and Manchester, Leeds and London, United Kingdom. Compliance with risk factor screening for GDM was assessed in relation to the following risk factors: obesity, family history of diabetes and increased ethnic risk. GDM was diagnosed using an oral Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT) with locally employed diagnostic criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS V22). Descriptive statistics are presented for the various baseline characteristics using numbers and percentages. Cross tabulation was used to compare relevant groups. When comparing group distributions Chi-square test was used. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In the entire cohort of 2432 women, 27% (650 Women) had one or more identifiable risk factors as defined by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for GDM. Of those that had identifiable GDM risk factors according to the NICE guidelines, 395(60.8%) were appropriately screened. 253 (38.9%) had risk factors but were not screened. 261 (14.6%) had no GDM NICE risk factors but were screened with an oral GTT. Women with a risk factor that were screened with a GTT had an 8.9% (n=34) prevalence of GDM. Of those that were screened but did not have a risk factor 7.7% (n=20) were diagnosed with GDM. Overall, 2% (54 women) of the cohort had a diagnosis of GDM. Ethnicity was the risk factor most likely to be missed (n=55, 66.3%). The GTT test was completed within the recommended gestational window (24-28 weeks) 56.6% (n=371) of the time. CONCLUSION: This study highlights poor compliance with risk factor screening for GDM in nulliparous women. Further investigation into the underlying reasons is warranted as well as the implications for pregnancy outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12607000551493.

Prevalence and predictors of alcohol use during pregnancy: findings from international multicentre cohort studies.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence and predictors of alcohol use in multiple cohorts. DESIGN: Cross-cohort comparison of retrospective and prospective studies. SETTING: Population-based studies in Ireland, the UK, Australia and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 17,244 women of predominantly Caucasian origin from two Irish retrospective studies (Growing up in Ireland (GUI) and Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System Ireland (PRAMS Ireland)), and one multicentre prospective international cohort, Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of alcohol use pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy across cohorts. Sociodemographic factors associated with alcohol consumption in each cohort. RESULTS: Alcohol consumption during pregnancy in Ireland ranged from 20% in GUI to 80% in SCOPE, and from 40% to 80% in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. Levels of exposure also varied substantially among drinkers in each cohort ranging from 70% consuming more than 1-2 units/week in the first trimester in SCOPE Ireland, to 46% and 15% in the retrospective studies. Smoking during pregnancy was the most consistent predictor of gestational alcohol use in all three cohorts, and smokers were 17% more likely to drink during pregnancy in SCOPE, relative risk (RR)=1.17 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.22), 50% more likely to drink during pregnancy in GUI, RR=1.50 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.65), and 42% more likely to drink in PRAMS, RR=1.42 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that alcohol use during pregnancy is prevalent and socially pervasive in the UK, Ireland, New Zealand and Australia. New policy and interventions are required to reduce alcohol prevalence both prior to and during pregnancy. Further research on biological markers and conventions for measuring alcohol use in pregnancy is required to improve the validity and reliability of prevalence estimates.

Maternal alcohol use during pregnancy and offspring trajectories of height and weight: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have examined associations between alcohol use in pregnancy and offspring birth size but evidence on whether associations persist during childhood is limited. METHODS: We examined the association between maternal drinking during pregnancy and trajectories of offspring weight and height from 0 to 10 years in 7597 mother-child pairs in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. To strengthen the inference, we compared the maternal alcohol-offspring growth association with the partner alcohol-offspring growth association, to partially control for unmeasured confounding. We also performed sensitivity analyses restricting our analysis to women of white ethnicity and participants with three or more growth measures. RESULTS: Maternal occasional or light daily drinking during pregnancy was not associated with reduced birth weight, birth length or offspring growth trajectories up to age 10 years. The infants of heavy drinking mothers were born 0.78cm shorter (95% CI -1.34, -0.22) and 0.22kg lighter (95% CI -0.34, -0.09) than infants of pregnancy abstainers but by age 10, offspring of heavy drinking mothers were of comparable height (mean difference 0.59cm, 95% CI -0.93, 2.11) and weight (mean difference 0.41kg, 95% CI -0.70, 1.52). These associations were not observed for heavy partner drinking and were not altered in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Maternal occasional or light daily drinking is not associated with birth weight, birth length or postnatal growth, but residual confounding may persist. Maternal heavy drinking may have an intrauterine association with reduced birth weight and length but this association is overcome during childhood.